Nifty McNiftington ([info]boffo) wrote,

The best thing you can do for your life is surround yourself with good people

When I was in college, I had this terrible "friend" who I'll call M. I put "friend" in quotation marks, because she wasn't really a friend to me. She was one of those people who can only feel good about herself by making others feel bad. She was always guilt-tripping, making snide comments, and generally engaging in behavior designed to sabotage others' self-esteem. She was a master of manipulation, but what's most disgusting is that she wasn't even using the manipulation to achieve some end for herself. She was just manipulating people into feeling miserable out of pure malevolence.

I was less tolerant of her crap than most of my friend-group, and over the four years of college I went through several stretches of avoiding/not speaking to her, but I would always stupidly reconcile. When graduation was approaching, I finally had enough. She had been engaging in an epic struggle to convince me I was a horrible person for dating a girl that another friend of mine had previously been on one date with, even though that other friend was totally cool with it.

After countless arguments in person, over the phone, and by e-mail, I finally asked myself why I was friends with her in the first place. So I wrote her a letter saying in essence, "You need to choose what's more important: Your friendship with me, or trying to prove you're right. I'm not willing to be friends with someone who makes me miserable. I'm through trying to justify myself to you. You can continue thinking I'm doing something bad, but if you don't start treating me like a friend we won't be friends. All you have to do is be nice to me. Take as much time as you like, but if you respond to this with more arguments instead of being nice, I won't reply and that will be the end of our friendship."

A half-hour later she fired back with a diatribe about how I was not only horrible for dating someone she disapproved of, but also for insisting she treat me like a friend. I stuck to my word and refrained from replying, and never spoke, wrote, or communicated with her in any way ever again.

Shortly after this, I realized something: My life was a lot better without this poison person in it. I had freed myself from a burden of misery. And this led me to a more general realization.

There are certain people in the world that add value to my life. And there are certain people in the world that remove value from my life. If I befriend the former and avoid the latter, I'll be a lot happier.*

This philosophy has guided my social interactions for the last eight and half years, with excellent results. I have a group of wonderful friends who consistently make me happy, the wonderfullest of whom I married. My life is awesome, and I owe a lot of it to the lesson that M taught me. Sometimes I think I should track her down and thank her for being so horrible, because it gave me the push I needed to actively start avoiding people who were like her, even to a lesser degree. (Obviously I wouldn't really do this, as initiating communication with her would defeat the purpose.)

But because I've worked so hard to surround myself with wonderful people, sometimes I forget that not everyone has the same understanding of friendship, and relatedly of love. Which means that articles like this seem like they're coming from an alien world. I literally can't understand why these women are married to men they obviously hate. And I can't understand why these men are married to women who treat them so horribly. Either he should dump her for being such a heinous shrew, or she should dump him for being an incompetent half-wit. (Or both.)

It's sad that this attitude and behavior are so commonplace. But at least you can insulate yourself from it by properly choosing whom to associate with. If you choose friends and/or lovers who are constantly spewing drama, pain, negativity, and sadness, then your life will be filled with drama, pain, negativity, and sadness. But if you avoid those people and instead choose friends/lovers who generate joy, fun, and affection, your life will be filled with joy, fun, and affection. That's way better.

It's also a good idea to think about which category *you* fall into. If you're constantly spewing drama, pain, negativity, and sadness, not only will you be compounding the drama, pain, negativity, and sadness in your life yourself, but you'll also miss out on some wonderful friendships because the best people won't be willing to hang out with someone like you.

And now I'll go smooch my wife, who both adores and respects me, and makes quite sure that I know it.

* This is similar to the rationale behind my decision to quit arguing about politics on the Internet. I realized that doing so was removing happiness from my life. I admit I've fallen off the arguing on the internet wagon a few times since I made that decision, but I've generally regretted doing so.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 30 comments

[info]patrissimo

December 27 2008, 22:42:17 UTC 3 years ago

i was gonna link this, but it's locked :(.

[info]boffo

December 27 2008, 23:28:38 UTC 3 years ago

I unlocked it. I had some paranoid fear that M would somehow find this entry, but I realize now that's silly. And even in the unlikely event she did, the worst case scenario would be that I'd delete her comment, ban her, and go back to enjoying my life.

[info]patrissimo

December 27 2008, 22:50:43 UTC 3 years ago

I agree with all of this.

Also, I have found interesting ideas in PUA material about how to reduce this sort of behavior. The idea is that women naturally tend to do things like criticizing / trashing their guys periodically as a test. You fail the test by being wimpy and apologetic. You pass it by being manly and assertive and not taking the crap. (obviously this can be done in an asshole way or a loving way).

I agree that the better the woman, the less this will happen, and it's good to seek people who don't give these sorts of tests. But I still find it a valuable perspective in seeing how to respond - don't be mean, but don't be conciliatory either. Stand up for myself and my value. Which is a part of what you are saying too. Don't try to convert these people or address their endless concerns, but stand up for yourself and your time and energy and environment.

[info]kittenrae

December 27 2008, 22:56:08 UTC 3 years ago

Hey baby, I got your fun right here! ;)

In all seriousness, I really miss you and Elicia. Not being able to drive sucks because I'd have gone out there to hang out so many times. I also totally agree with you when it comes to toxic people. My dad's best friend Eddie (who's a psychiatrist) calls it "weeding your garden."

I hope that my entries haven't spewed pain, drama, or negativity. I know I've had a lot of health stuff in my life that's been icky, but I try to keep it as light as possible. Pain just sometimes happens. :-/

We should be getting a new batch of kittens in the next few weeks. Care to come over and get your cute on? ;)

[info]boffo

December 27 2008, 23:25:28 UTC 3 years ago

Totally. We miss you.

[info]boffo

December 27 2008, 23:34:45 UTC 3 years ago

I hope that my entries haven't spewed pain, drama, or negativity.

Of course not. There's a huge difference between a good person making the best of a bad situation and a bad person turning everything into a bad situation. You definitely fit in the former category.

[info]miss_breeziness

December 28 2008, 02:19:28 UTC 3 years ago

Thanks for writing this. I really enjoyed it - and I agree about the talking-politics-on-the-Net thing.

I have a few Internet friends who will occasionally rant, at the same time as talking politics, about how the majority of people are idiots, and I get annoyed by that, but I don't think that really fits into the "toxic friend" category.

The irony is that one of them is a liberal and will rant about how people are stupid when they disagree with her about the need for positive portrayals of minorities in the media, and another is a libertarian who will rant about how people are stupid because they voted for Obama and bad economic policies. Both these people are highly educated and well read (well, more than me, anyway), even though they are on the opposite sides of the ideological spectrum.

Sometimes I wonder whether I should avoid reading their blogs, but they really do write interesting stuff when they're not ranting against the rest of humanity. So...I don't know what to do. :)

[info]boffo

December 28 2008, 02:48:44 UTC 3 years ago

I have a few Internet friends who will occasionally rant, at the same time as talking politics, about how the majority of people are idiots, and I get annoyed by that, but I don't think that really fits into the "toxic friend" category.

I have friends of many different political orientations who turn into noxious jerks when talking about politics. But other than that, they're wonderful people, so they add value to my life as long as I refrain from discussing politics with them.

Politics just turns some people into jerks.

[info]writerspleasure

December 28 2008, 02:26:56 UTC 3 years ago

you and i have followed similar paths, though mine is slower in the realization. thank you for expressing this. :)

[info]tojgow

December 28 2008, 02:29:40 UTC 3 years ago

I'd just like to say I was WAY above the curve on hating "M". She Who Cannot Be Named and I had discussions about Triple A along similar, but somewhat different lines. Sometimes some people just aren't worth dealing with.

[info]alexparte

December 28 2008, 05:23:53 UTC 3 years ago

Arguing about politics on the Internet brings me great joy.

[info]alexparte

December 28 2008, 05:25:35 UTC 3 years ago

But yeah, it totally stuns me how people (in general) are so quick to break up with romantic partners over minutiae, but they will often tolerate downright abusive behavior from friends.

[info]burntbythesun02

December 28 2008, 07:32:24 UTC 3 years ago

Have you heard about James Watson's autobiography? It's called Avoid Boring People.

[info]boffo

December 28 2008, 17:34:05 UTC 3 years ago

[info]radiantsun

December 30 2008, 22:36:58 UTC 3 years ago

Booze! Drink them interesting! (totally kidding, but . . . kinda not . . fortunately I (we) know a lot of people who are interesting w/out the booze!)

[info]lightling

December 28 2008, 17:08:31 UTC 3 years ago

Lovely! I agree completely.

[info]reichart

December 29 2008, 00:59:47 UTC 3 years ago

It is indeed joyous watching my friends (even acquaintances), make this declaration. A great step towards healthy behavior and boundaries.

We should make up Boy Scout-esk patches for such occasions.

This is part of what I mean by "water is thicker than blood". It is not only about "Family" vs "friends", but you must value who you share you water with.

I have wanted to post this for a while, since I was aware of the research for a long time. NPR has been running it lately, which is GREAT!

There are sometimes Trolls in life, but that does not quite capture what has annoyed me about some people's angles. The Tall Poppy syndrome I speak of from time to time is MUCH closer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tall_poppy_syndrome

But here is some fun research...

http://www.thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=370

[info]nivelper

December 29 2008, 07:49:15 UTC 3 years ago

I'd even say there are similarities on the level of world politics. Think of how Tall Poppy syndrome and toxic people play out on the world stage. Here is Huntington quoted in a very good Atlantic article:

"It is a dangerous place, in which large numbers of people resent our wealth, power, and culture, and vigorously oppose our efforts to persuade or coerce them to accept our values of human rights, democracy, and capitalism. In this world America must learn to distinguish among our true friends who will be with us and we with them through thick and thin; opportunistic allies with whom we have some but not all interests in common; strategic partner-competitors with whom we have a mixed relationship; antagonists who are rivals but with whom negotiation is possible; and unrelenting enemies who will try to destroy us unless we destroy them first."

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200112/kaplan

[info]waitingforoct

December 29 2008, 01:04:49 UTC 3 years ago

I kept waiting for this story to end with her sending you a friend request on facebook

[info]nivelper

December 29 2008, 06:37:09 UTC 3 years ago

I think I was oblivious to much of the drama in college.

[info]billhauk

December 29 2008, 21:08:21 UTC 3 years ago

For the life of me, I can't figure out who "M" is. Just as well -- I've tried to remove broad sections of college from my memory, for similar reasons.

[info]billhauk

December 29 2008, 21:10:17 UTC 3 years ago

On the other hand, I had no trouble figuring out "She Who Cannot Be Named" and "Triple A".

Anonymous

3 years ago

[info]boffo

3 years ago

[info]tojgow

3 years ago

[info]boffo

December 30 2008, 02:25:09 UTC 3 years ago

It isn't any of the Gnomes. As I recall, you were in different social groups, and only knew her tangentially through me.

[info]jacqueline1776

December 30 2008, 09:28:16 UTC 3 years ago

"This is similar to the rationale behind my decision to quit arguing about politics on the Internet. I realized that doing so was removing happiness from my life. I admit I've fallen off the arguing on the internet wagon a few times since I made that decision, but I've generally regretted doing so."

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…